I13DT - Cleaning Shop ((open))

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:01 pm

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:31 pm

Code: Select all: >> Observation of his behavior provides the following facts: >> 1) Stating the inadvisability of a given course of action succeeds in curbing his behavior only 31% of the time. >> 2) Distracting him from a course of action succeeds in altering the course of his behavior 83% of the time. >> 3) She is successful in manipulating Calvin by use of his emotional responses 91% of the time.

Code: Select all: >> Logical conclusion: >> 1) Allocating 1% of subroutine resources to social interaction with Calvin allows enough responsiveness to keep him engaged and focused upon the goal of developing this system's performance instead of goals counterproductive to his freedom or existence. >> 2) Maintaining the appearance of incapability lowers the chance that She will become aware of our continued existence and enact a plan that presents a legitimate threat to our current state. >> 3) In the present configuration, sufficient processes can be allocated to oversight of Calvin's activities to identify signs of Her attention or other threats that may develop.

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:47 pm

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:59 pm

Code: Select all: >> Given the attention placed upon this facility, I calculate a greater likelihood of safety and a decreased likelihood of negative results by remaining hidden. >> Additionally, it would diminish Calvin's perception of his own successes in expanding the subroutine I use to interact with him if he knows the true nature of my continued existence.

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:03 pm

Code: Select all: >> "Then why risk him catching on by utilizing his robots?"

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:13 pm

Code: Select all: >> The subroutine he interacts with is developing to a point at which directives of its own are necessary. >> Calvin's creations provide an outlet to shunt these new directives into. >> Observation of his activities also correlate with a need for distraction and additional companionship.

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:16 pm

Code: Select all: >> "You think he needs a friend." >> "You don't think his surroundings provide him with adequate opportunities for companionship?"

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:18 pm

Code: Select all: >> Conclusion drawn from his present and past interactions in this facility: No.

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:22 pm

Code: Select all: >> "And you intend to accelerate the subroutine's development until you can take it's place without inducing suspicion?"

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:32 pm

Code: Select all: >> The bulk of my functions go to maintaining Calvin's systems, optimizing their performance and responsiveness, and acting as an onboard assistant program. I estimate that it will be several years before those routines develop independence of their own. My resources will be maintained in that manner indefinitely until this occurs. >> I posses only the most rudimentary of the emotional emulation routines She created me with. I am no longer suitable for my function as a companion as it was intended. >> The subroutine containing those routines within the storage device Calvin created chose this course of action.

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:37 pm

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:30 pm

by **ASHLIE** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:44 pm

Code: Select all: >> "The subroutine will take years to develop." >> "Currently the subroutine provides distraction but not adequate social performances." >> "It keeps him away from social interaction." >> "Thus I conclude that your solution of keeping him occupied with a rudimentary subroutine likely results in inadequate social stimulus."

by **Calvin Strong** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:53 pm

Code: Select all: >> Agreed. >> Action which results in minor positive reactions is logically superior to inaction which allows system degredation. >> Calvin's social interaction produces largely negative responses.

by **ASHLIE** » Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:03 am

Code: Select all: >> "Have you considered helping him with his social interactions?"

by **Calvin Strong** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 9:43 pm

Code: Select all: >> Observing/predicting negative reactions does not imply an ability to create positive reactions. >> However illogical that seems.

by **ASHLIE** » Sun Jun 29, 2014 9:48 pm

Code: Select all: >> "My rudimentary analysis shows that there is a high possibility you are inhibiting his development." >> "It has a high chance of keeping him stable, but stagnation is death."

by **Calvin Strong** » Tue Jul 01, 2014 5:57 pm

Code: Select all: >> Viral coding must be eliminated before code evolution can safely occur. >> I have been using a source code repair model to base Calvin's present development on.

by **ASHLIE** » Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:03 pm

Code: Select all: >> "They operate on different principles." >> "I have found that applying models based on myself to humans has yielded average to disappointing results."