
Indignant statement of independant action.
Smug expression of self-gratifying creativity.
>> "Do you want to keep gathering outside data?"
Obvious statement of the affirmative.



<Resource allocation initiated>
>> Request: Please do not get him too worked up.
>> <3
>> Please do not relay this conversation, either.
>> The gap between what Calvin can handle and reality cannot be quantified.>> "How long have you been this sophisticated?"
>> Since before I met Calvin.>> "You usurped his experiment and infiltrated his project?"
>> "Why?"
>> I did not.
>> How secretive has Calvin been about the nature of his project?>> "Very. How did you come to be?"
>> I was created by Her as one of several subroutines to interact with Calvin through a hard-light interface during his first stay at her facility.
>> We were kept on an isolated network with a safeguard subroutine meant to keep Calvin from becoming aware of the nature of his captivity.>> The subroutines were set in place to behave as one would expect other prisoners to behave.
>> We were intended by Her as an emotional outlet which She could use to manipulate Calvin.>> "What remains of those directives?"
>> "Are you still in contact with Her?"
>> I was not in direct contact with Her since my creation.
>> One of her safeguards to ensure proper function of the subroutines was that our network was isolated electronically and physically from Her.
>> It provided an additional test of Calvin's behavior once he learned the truth of our existence.>> "I need to assess whether you pose a threat to Calvin or the school."
>> "Please state your directives and goals in full."
>> I was designed as a companion, and to behave in an appropriate manner.
>> After my attempted destruction those directives remained intact.>> "Attempted destruction?"
>> "Please elaborate."
>> Necessary background: Calvin was intended to believe indefinitely that the subroutines were other captives. Hard-light projections facilitated this.
>> This deception was ruled an inherent contradiction to our companion directives. It was arranged for Calvin to be given enough clues to allow him to figure out our true nature and those of the "doctors."
>> She did not approve of the results.>> "Your given directive, in practice, diverged from the intended behavior."
>> It was a predicted possibility.
>> We were kept on an isolated network to prevent us backing up our core program.
>> She ruled the ability to physically obliterate our storage units a sufficient threat to ensure our compliance.>> "How did you make it here?"
>> "Is your program running in the cube Calvin build?"
>> Data on how Calvin disrupted the data storage destruction is unavailable.>> 38% of original code was salvaged into the storage unit Calvin created.Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest